Skip to content

Add the Erdős 779 statement - #20

Merged
senamakel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
add-erdos-779-statement
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

senamakel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
add-erdos-779-statement

Conversation

@senamakel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Adds loops/statements/erdos-779.lean, the Erdős Problem 779 statement the
erdos-779 loop starts from: Supermath.primorial, Holds, Conjecture
(as stated in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures, ErdosProblems/779.lean)
and the four pinned rungs Rung1–Rung4 the loop's scorer checks by exact
type. The commit was made on local main on 2026-10-25 and never pushed; this
puts it on a branch.

Related issue

None.

API or behavior changes

None. A new statement file only; no crate reads loops/statements/.

Validation

  • The file is byte-for-byte the frozen lean/Supermath/Statement.lean of the
    erdos-779 loop (diff reports no difference), which lean_check checks on
    every scoring of runs 4 to 11, and which Ladder.lean imports and checks
    clean against.
  • The cargo commands below were not run for this PR: it changes no Rust and no
    file a crate or test reads. CI runs them.
  • cargo fmt --all -- --check
  • cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
  • cargo build --all-targets --all-features
  • cargo test --all-features

Tests

None added: a statement file with no code reading it.

Documentation

Not needed; the file's own docstring states the source and the rungs.

Checklist

  • The change is focused on one logical change
  • No new #[allow(...)], #[ignore], or relaxed lints
  • No secrets, tokens, or .env contents in the diff or the description

Add the formal statement of Erdős problem 779 so it can be referenced
by future proofs and tracked alongside the other loop statements.

Auto-committed-on: cuttlefish
Co-authored-by: Medulla <medulla@tinyhumans.ai>
@tinysweeper

tinysweeper Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tiny Sweeper review

⚠️ Review of 46f1624d923e stopped because the pull request closed or changed.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

  • Run on-demand review

This review includes 1 billable file and costs up to $0.25.

Or wait 50 minutes for your next included review.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 1db5a5b0-0e02-482e-8e2a-f5d301257cc7
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4e394b and 46f1624.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • loops/statements/erdos-779.lean
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-25T13:42:17.425059Z 46f1624 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@senamakel
senamakel merged commit b829c67 into main Oct 25, 2026
8 checks passed
@senamakel
senamakel deleted the add-erdos-779-statement branch October 26, 2026 05:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant