[fmease]

_{(No LLM was or will be used by me during the entire creation process of this PR)}

[rustbot]

r? @camelid

rustbot has assigned @camelid.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

• Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler, parser
• compiler, parser expanded to 77 candidates
• Random selection from 20 candidates

[fmease]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: bf712a5 (bf712a5851cabfcef6f5397f6ebe1eef0db3297b)
Base parent: 15c1044 (15c10447a46529b68e38c7f138aeb95240e4d7d6)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (bf712a5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. Consider adding rollup=never if this change is not fit for rolling up.

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 3.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.7%	[3.5%, 3.8%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (secondary 0.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.8%	[2.8%, 2.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 490.17s -> 496.821s (1.36%)
Artifact size: 408.94 MiB -> 409.03 MiB (0.02%)

[fmease]

(most likely spurious)

(I originally issued the perf run since I converted macro calls into function pointer calls)

[rustbot]

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.