Skip to content

Rollup of 7 pull requests - #124645

Closed
fmease wants to merge 28 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
fmease:rollup-cp1aaaj
Closed

fmease wants to merge 28 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
fmease:rollup-cp1aaaj

Conversation

@fmease

@fmease fmease commented May 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

deep-outcome and others added 28 commits April 27, 2024 16:57
"is greater or equal to". Beside common sense.
library/backtrace also declares a feature called `gimli-symbolize` which
appear used, but the feature in std with the same name is unused, so
remove it.
`ConstKind::Value` is the only variant where control flow leaves the
first match on `impl_ct.kind()`, so there is no need for a second match
on the same expression later on.
Sort them, and remove the unused ones (`lint_reasons` and
`proc_macro_span`).
They each have a single call site.
Control flow never gets past the end of the `ExpandResult::Retry` match
arm, due to the `span_bug` and the `continue`. Therefore, the code after
the match can only be reached from the `ExpandResult::Ready` arm.

This commit moves that code after the match into the
`ExpandResult::Ready` arm, avoiding the need for the `continue` in the
`ExpandResult::Retry` arm.
Too clever by half, IMO.
Alongside the existing `Invocation::span`.
Because the type is not obvious, and this clarifies things.
It is currently an enum and the `tts` and `idx` fields are repeated
across the two variants.

This commit splits it into a struct `Frame` and an enum `FrameKind`, to
factor out the duplication. The commit also renames `Frame::new` as
`Frame::new_delimited` and adds `Frame::new_sequence`. I.e. both
variants now have a constructor.
…s, r=Amanieu

String.truncate comment microfix (greater or equal)

String.truncate calls Vec.truncate, in turn, and that states "is greater or equal to". Beside common sense.
run-make-support: preserve tooks.mk behavior for EXTRACXXFLAGS

In rust-lang#123149 when trying to add a command wrapper for `cc`, I didn't preserve the behavior of tools.mk completely: tools.mk had

```makefile
# Extra flags needed to compile a working executable with the standard library
ifdef IS_WINDOWS
ifdef IS_MSVC
	#EXTRACFLAGS := ws2_32.lib userenv.lib advapi32.lib bcrypt.lib ntdll.lib synchronization.lib
else
	#EXTRACFLAGS := -lws2_32 -luserenv -lbcrypt -lntdll -lsynchronization
	EXTRACXXFLAGS := -lstdc++
	#EXTRARSCXXFLAGS := -l static:-bundle=stdc++
endif
else
ifeq ($(UNAME),Darwin)
	#EXTRACFLAGS := -lresolv
	EXTRACXXFLAGS := -lc++
	#EXTRARSCXXFLAGS := -lc++
else
ifeq ($(UNAME),FreeBSD)
	#EXTRACFLAGS := -lm -lpthread -lgcc_s
else
ifeq ($(UNAME),SunOS)
	#EXTRACFLAGS := -lm -lpthread -lposix4 -lsocket -lresolv
else
ifeq ($(UNAME),OpenBSD)
	#EXTRACFLAGS := -lm -lpthread -lc++abi
	#RUSTC := $(RUSTC) -C linker="$(word 1,$(CC:ccache=))"
else
	#EXTRACFLAGS := -lm -lrt -ldl -lpthread
	EXTRACXXFLAGS := -lstdc++
	#EXTRARSCXXFLAGS := -lstdc++
endif
endif
endif
endif
endif
```

Note that for {`FreeBSD`, `SunOs`, `OpenBSD`} the `-lstdc++` flag is *not* passed, so `EXTRACXXFLAGS` for those platforms should be an empty `vec![]`.

r? ghost (testing this with PR CI)
…kingjubilee

library/std: Remove unused `gimli-symbolize` feature

library/backtrace also declares a feature called `gimli-symbolize` which appear used, but the feature in std with the same name is unused, so remove it.
… r=compiler-errors

`rustc_expand` cleanups

Some cleanups I made while looking through this code. Nothing that requires any real domain-specific knowledge about this crate.

r? ```@michaelwoerister```
variable-precision float operations can differ depending on optimization levels

Follow-up to rust-lang#121793 and rust-lang#118217 that accounts for optimizations changing the precision of these functions.

Fixes rust-lang#109118
Fixes rust-lang#71355
Tweak `consts_may_unify`

r? ```@lcnr```
…yn, r=compiler-errors

AST pretty: Use `builtin_syntax` for type ascription

Follow-up to rust-lang#122806.
CC #124619.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 3, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 3, 2024
@fmease

fmease commented May 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors

bors commented May 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit b8a9e20 has been approved by fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 3, 2024
@fmease

fmease commented May 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

#122662 is a pending zombie.
@bors force

@bors

bors commented May 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit b8a9e20 with merge 13c92e5...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124441 (String.truncate comment microfix (greater or equal))
 - rust-lang#124594 (run-make-support: preserve tooks.mk behavior for EXTRACXXFLAGS)
 - rust-lang#124604 (library/std: Remove unused `gimli-symbolize` feature)
 - rust-lang#124607 (`rustc_expand` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#124609 (variable-precision float operations can differ depending on optimization levels)
 - rust-lang#124610 (Tweak `consts_may_unify`)
 - rust-lang#124637 (AST pretty: Use `builtin_syntax` for type ascription)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#124638 (Move some tests from `rustc_expand` to `rustc_parse`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@rust-log-analyzer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The job armhf-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors

bors commented May 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 3, 2024
@fmease fmease closed this May 3, 2024
@fmease
fmease deleted the rollup-cp1aaaj branch May 3, 2024 12:27
@fmease fmease removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rollup A PR which is a rollup T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants