Skip to content

Bump ruff to 0.17.0 - #131

Merged
puddly merged 1 commit into
puddly:devfrom
TheJulianJES:tjj/ruff-0.17
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

puddly merged 1 commit into
puddly:devfrom
TheJulianJES:tjj/ruff-0.17

Conversation

@TheJulianJES

@TheJulianJES TheJulianJES commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ruff 0.17.0 collapses two import blocks with trailing # noqa comments, which older versions flag again, so also raise the lower bound in the dev extra to keep freshly built environments consistent.

Related:

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.31%. Comparing base (7334430) to head (3f60a6f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #131   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.31%   94.31%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        4345     4345           
=======================================
  Hits         4098     4098           
  Misses        247      247           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

ruff 0.17.0 collapses two import blocks with trailing `# noqa` comments,
which older versions flag again, so also raise the lower bound in the `dev`
extra to keep freshly built environments consistent.
@puddly
puddly merged commit f77513f into puddly:dev Oct 12, 2026
31 checks passed
@TheJulianJES
TheJulianJES deleted the tjj/ruff-0.17 branch October 12, 2026 22:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants