Repository navigation
Conversation
- Fix scope depth tie that folded first-level modules (Swift packages, Gradle modules) into the root scope - Keep LLM scope boundaries when the root manifest is only a container - Pick manifests deterministically by priority; add Xcode, CocoaPods, XcodeGen, Tuist, Gradle settings, Deno, Nx, pnpm workspace, go.work - Extract Gradle namespace and Xcode project names as package names - Add review.max_concurrent_scopes cap for per-scope fan-out - Split RLM action steps locally so extraction-model commentary no longer reaches Opus (content_filter refusals) - Fall back to deterministic scopes when refinement fails; soft-fail the audit instead of aborting the review - Escape untrusted text printed through Rich markup
# Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # action.yml # pyproject.toml # src/codespy/__init__.py # src/codespy/config.py
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
New opt-in
seoreview module that flags PR changes hurting crawling, indexing, ranking or AI citation (Googlebot, Bingbot, GPTBot/OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, AI Overviews) of public websites. Runs on RLM alongside code_review, doc and supply_chain, and emits standardIssues with the newIssueCategory.SEO.Gating (
review.seo)enabled: falseby default.scopes: fnmatch globs on scope subroot. If set, matching scopes skip web-stack detection.scopesis empty, a deterministic (no LLM)is_web_scopecheck detects JS frameworks, SSGs, server templates or plain HTML.has_web_relevant_changesalways applies, so backend-only diffs cost nothing. Every skip is logged.Review
scope.skills).list_site_config/read_site_configfor robots, sitemap, llms.txt, redirects, hosting and framework config anywhere in the repo. Results use arepo:path prefix, which is stripped before subroot path restoration.Human review:.Wiring
seoepisode.codespy.yaml,.env.exampleandaction.yml:seo-*inputs, env mappings and Docker pass-through.Not in this PR
docs/configuration.mdand README updates.read_site_configcan list such files but may not be able to read them.action.yml: the existing*-max-tokensinputs for code-review, doc, supply-chain, summary and audit are not mapped to env vars. This predates this PR and is not fixed here.