Repository navigation
Fixes ownership and relocation problems when Itential Platform is installed with a custom platform_user/platform_group and relocated directories - #384
Merged
kvelarde-itential merged 3 commits intoOct 30, 2026
Conversation
kvelarde-itential
requested review from
Amunagala-itential,
Madias2222 and
Nick-Andreano
October 30, 2026 15:38
Nick-Andreano
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The itential-platform RPM hardcodes itential:itential ownership on every path it ships and resets it on install and upgrade. The deployer only re-owned the server, config and log directories, non-recursively. Most of the install and home trees stayed itential:itential, so the custom user couldn't use them. A customer reported this.
Changes (roles/platform)
Testing
Each test was a fresh Rocky 9 all-in-one on Itential Platform 6.5.2, and I inspected ownership over SSH. The pipeline passed every phase, including certify_platform, in all three:
Known limitations