Skip to content

chore: bump version to 2.33.2 - #404

Merged
ketor merged 1 commit into
dingodb:mainfrom
ketor:release/bump-2.33.2
Oct 24, 2026
Merged

ketor merged 1 commit into
dingodb:mainfrom
ketor:release/bump-2.33.2

Conversation

@ketor

@ketor ketor commented Oct 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Patch release 2.33.2. vLLM connector only: there are no src/ (C++) or server-path changes since v2.33.1, and CMakeLists.txt only registers Python tests.

Version positions synced (6): VERSION, the three connector project.version fields, and the two dfkv-common pins. A local wheel build produces dfkv_{common,connector,vllm}-2.33.2-py3-none-any.whl, and test_release_contract passes.

Changes since v2.33.1: #398, #399, #400, #401, #402, #403. See CHANGELOG "Unreleased".

Rollout note: objects published by earlier releases (#398's retired-page SAVE) are not overwritten under keep-first, so roll out with a fresh model_revision namespace.

Patch release for the vLLM connector. No C++ or server-path changes
since v2.33.1 (src/ untouched; CMakeLists.txt only registers Python
tests), so it is released as a patch per the client/server rule.

Carries:
- cached prefill progress without new blocks: a sub-block chunk no
  longer desynchronizes the tracker, which could SAVE a retired page
  under a valid key (dingodb#398)
- KV events survive cross-worker aggregation (dingodb#401)
- lookup probes every CP key coordinate (dingodb#402)
- fail closed on recurrent-state SAVEs at boundaries not computed in
  the step (dingodb#403)
- MultiConnector pending-load, sleep-mode, lookup IPC path and PP-stage
  fixes (dingodb#400)
- CI now runs the vLLM connector suite on CPU and previously
  unregistered Python tests (dingodb#398, dingodb#399)

Caches written by earlier releases may hold mismatched objects that
keep-first will not overwrite; roll out with a fresh model_revision
namespace.
@ketor
ketor added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 24, 2026
Merged via the queue into dingodb:main with commit a7cf925 Oct 24, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant