Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

7 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Best practices when building a CAD model

  • This is intended to be advice for FRC teams scrambling to quickly scour online resources for ideas on how to proceed with their own robot designs.

How should the CAD model be structured?

  • Ideally, the CAD model of the robot should contain a few Major Subassemblies that bolt together to complete the Top Assembly (which represents the complete robot).
    • Each of those major subassemblies may further comprise smaller subassemblies, creating a hierarchical assembly structure.
  • To illustrate this, I will use the example of the Cranberry Alarm Ri3D - 2026 - Mini Fridge. This video reveals a robot which was designed and built in 3 days. The CAD model has been shared here. This CAD model does not have a hierarchical assembly structure and is thus pretty difficult to navigate. (In fairness to the team that produced it, they were scrambling to get something out in 3 days so they can be forgiven.)

Cranberry Alarm Ri3D Robot

What would be the Best Practice for building this CAD model?

  • Let's assume that the robot team decides to implement some of the features of this robot into their own design.
  • The first step would be to identify the major subsystem assemblies as shown below:
Name of subsystem Image
Chassis chassis
Hopper & Intake hopper
Feed & Shooter Feed & Shooter

The existing CAD file is not broken into sub-assemblies this way.

  • But it would certainly be advantageous to structure the CAD file this way.
    • It would make it easier to navigate.
    • Multiple people could work simultaneously on the robot design, each on a different subsystem.
    • It would make it easier to design the mechanical connections between subsystems
    • It would make it easier to facilitate service in the pit if subsystems were designed to be quickly removable.
  • I would suggest that our robot design team undertake to replicate the Cranberry Alarm robot but using a top down assembly structure.
    • This would be excellent practice for all on the CAD team.
    • It would be helpful to further break the major assemblies into component subassemblies.
      • The shooter (AndyMark Launcher in a Box) is rotationally mounted to operate as a rotating turret, so this is is an obvious sub-assembly.
      • The intake & hopper could be broken into component subassemblies, making it possible to show the pivoting motion of the intake w/r/t the fixed part of the hopper, and showing the moving part of the hopper being pushed to slide out.
    • The CAD model could then be used to demonstrate mechanisms as animations.
    • This futher allows the CAD model to be used to investigate part clearances during the animation cycle, discovering (and avoiding) any interferences early in the design process.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors