lcc — Local Context Compiler

Compact coding-agent context without summarizing it away.
lcc cuts what the model does not need, keeps everything else byte for byte, and writes a receipt.

/compact vs lcc

Claude Code's /compact replaces your session with a summary written by a model. Summaries drop the exact error, path or line the agent needs two turns later. lcc does the opposite: old tool outputs leave the context but stay one recall away, and every user and assistant message is kept as it was.

One real Claude Code session (193 messages, 75 tool calls)	tokens	user and assistant messages	removed tool outputs
before	57,083	43, as written	—
/compact	one summary	rewritten into the summary	gone
lcc (rules, stashed)	28,807 (−49.5%)	43 / 43 byte for byte	33, each one recall away

Measured with lcc measure-session (1.2.0, offline, exact o200k_base token count). That session is one of the best cases. Across all 266 of my long sessions (100+ messages each, 31.6 M tokens) the median cut was 22.7% (middle half 15% to 32%, best 65%), with 0 messages lost. These are all my sessions: run it on yours and post the result.

In a pre-registered test on 172 real requests (evidence), an agent answering from the stashed context plus recall did as well as with the full context on file recall (+0.006, 95% CI −0.023 to +0.034) with 36.6% fewer tokens. It called recall for 90% of the questions about removed content. A /compact-style summary of the same sessions got 73% of exact values right (our reimplementation of /compact, written by Opus); full and verbatim context got 98%.

Install

pip install "local-context-compiler[tiktoken]"   # the CLI is `lcc`

Claude Code plugin (replaces the /compact summary). Function hooks are early access, so this needs Claude Code 2.1.274+ and the flag below:

export CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_FUNCTION_HOOKS=1
claude plugin marketplace add lucasmartins-ai/lcc
claude plugin install lcc@lcc --config provider=rules --config rulesMode=stashed

Allow mcp__plugin_lcc_lcc__recall so the agent can get removed outputs back. When a pass fails or removes too little, the plugin hands over to the built-in summary and says so in a toast. Details: Claude Code guide.

MCP (Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop, any stdio client):

{"mcpServers": {"lcc": {"command": "lcc", "args": ["mcp"]}}}

Tools: compact, compact_transcript, recall, inspect, prepare, explain, intake (MCP guide).

CLI, on a session file or any document:

lcc compact ~/.claude/projects/<project>/<session>.jsonl -q "finish the parser fix" \
  --mode tool-calls --provider rules --rules-mode stashed -o compacted.json -r report.json
lcc recall <id>                                   # a removed output, hash-checked

lcc compact notes.md -q "what is wrong with the booking flow?" \
  --provider mechanical -o compacted.md -r report.json
lcc explain report.json --source notes.md         # why each block was kept or dropped

Send us your numbers

lcc measure-session ~/.claude/projects/<project>/<session>.jsonl --markdown
# Codex CLI rollouts are auto-detected from their session_meta record:
lcc measure-session /path/to/rollout.jsonl --markdown

It runs every mode on one of your sessions, offline, and prints counts only: messages, tool calls, tokens before and after, messages kept, time. No text, path or tool output. For exact counts, install the tiktoken extra and cache its tokenizer once (lcc itself never downloads): python -c "import tiktoken; tiktoken.get_encoding('o200k_base')". Otherwise the report says approximate and why. Paste it in Discussions → Results. Already compacting with lcc? lcc share-stats turns your local reports into the same kind of counts-only summary (SHARE_STATS.md), or use the results issue form. Every number from someone other than me makes the claims above less mine and more true.

Why lcc

• Verbatim. Kept spans are byte-identical to the source. Nothing is summarized or rewritten.
• Recoverable. stashed moves removed outputs to a local content-addressed store (~/.cache/lcc/stash); recall re-hashes on read.
• Auditable. Every pass writes a JSON report; lcc explain gives the reason for every drop.
• Local. The default judges run on your CPU in plain Python. No API key, no network.

Providers

Provider	Runs	When it is used	Report says
specialist-v3	local, CPU	default (auto) whenever transcript blocks are present: the Claude Code hook, compact_transcript, --mode tool-calls	semantic_guarantee: none (a rank, not a judgment)
mechanical	local, CPU	--provider mechanical; plain text under auto (a configured TypeSafe key does not change that unless LCC_AUTO_REMOTE=1)	semantic_guarantee: none
rules (lossless, recoverable, stashed)	local, no model	provider: rules for transcripts	lossless: only provable duplicates removed; recoverable: also outputs that can be re-read; stashed (recommended): removed outputs stay byte-recoverable through recall
jev	remote (TypeSafe API)	opt-in: --provider jev / provider: jev, needs TYPESAFE_API_KEY	semantic judgment or explicit degradation
laya	local model	deprecated; runs only when named	named model and fallback state

specialist-v3 details and limits: SPECIALIST.md. Rules modes: TOOL_CALLS.md. Jev is an optional path you name explicitly (--provider jev); it sends the objective and context blocks to the TypeSafe API, and LCC_DISABLE_NETWORK=1 disables it. auto never picks it on its own: having a key is not consent to send context off-machine, so plain text under auto stays on mechanical unless you set LCC_AUTO_REMOTE=1. compact writes a relevance-compaction-1.2 report; check provider_used and degraded before trusting the output.

Benchmarks

Real sessions (held-out, INFERIDO). In plain words: when a ranker has to drop part of a session, how often does it keep what the agent actually used next? 1.0 would be always. A one-shot final test on 193 items from 36 of the maintainer's sessions that started after the training cutoff. Retention AUC over drop budgets of 0–60% of candidate tokens:

ranker	recall AUC	all-kept AUC
specialist-v3	0.899	0.434
mechanical	0.829	0.238
recency	0.818	0.306
bm25	0.803	0.270
random	0.689	0.138

The labels are next-action evidence from one maintainer's Claude Code sessions, which favours v3's training target. The sessions are private; only aggregates are published (SPECIALIST.md).

Synthetic, reproducible (python benchmarks/run_judge_bench.py, about 20 s, no network). Nine hand-written edge cases: supersession, contradiction, config change, exception rule, pt/en mixed, prompt injection in a tool output, large git diff, old root cause, re-read.

raw ranking	specialist-v3	mechanical	bm25	recency
cases with every must-keep block kept at a 30 / 50 / 70% cut (of 9)	8 / 7 / 7	9 / 9 / 9	9 / 9 / 7	8 / 6 / 3

full pass, default settings	must-keep kept	302 blocks	1,138 blocks	peak RSS
specialist-v3, tool-call mode	9/9	181 ms	3.4 s	71 MB
rules lossless	9/9	2 ms	16 ms	55 MB

These cases are lexically easy, so the lexical baselines do well; v3 misses the Portuguese case. Timings are from macOS arm64 under heavy machine load. Method, every arm and the limits: BENCHMARKS.md. Rules modes on real sessions: REAL_SESSION_BENCHMARKS.md.

Reduction depends on how much of a context is noise. Below a 25% gain, the report marks the pass as not worth it, and the Claude Code plugin keeps the built-in summary.

What it does not do

• It does not check that a model will answer correctly. A structural PASS is not an answer quality result.
• No RAG, embeddings or vector store.
• Protection rules and bounded restoration reduce, but do not rule out, lost evidence; see the safety model.
• specialist-v3 was trained on Claude Code transcripts. Other agents and plain documents are out of distribution; plain text uses mechanical unless you opt in to Jev.

Docs

Topic	Link
Five-minute tour of the CLI	QUICKSTART.md
Claude Code plugin	CLAUDE_CODE.md
MCP server	MCP.md
Tool-call compaction and rules modes	TOOL_CALLS.md
The local ranker	SPECIALIST.md
Benchmarks	BENCHMARKS.md, REAL_SESSION_BENCHMARKS.md, benchmarks/
Python API (lcc.msi.compile)	msi-api.md
Architecture and decisions	architecture.md, ADR 0010, ADR index
Opt-in and deprecated providers	JEV.md, LAYA.md
Research archive	paper.md, results-master.md, TRANSCRIPT_AB.md
Privacy	PRIVACY_POLICY.md

Development

Python 3.11+.

python -m pip install -e '.[dev,tiktoken]'
pytest -q && ruff check . && mypy
npm test                                   # Node API and hook tests
python benchmarks/run_judge_bench.py --check --out /tmp/judge-bench

The PyPI package named lcc is unrelated; this one is local-context-compiler. Contributing: CONTRIBUTING.md. Security: SECURITY.md. Changes: CHANGELOG.md.

License

MIT. The optional Laya integration carries Apache-2.0 attribution in NOTICE. Maintained by LookADev.