Test changed-key persistence and Autumn usage rollup - #34
Draft
RhysSullivan wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
RhysSullivan wants to merge 1 commit into
RhysSullivan wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
RhysSullivan
added this pull request to stack #35
September 24, 2026 19:20
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tests for #33.
An admission sequence on the Durable Object (unchanged lookup writes ledger records only, no
list()calls, 301 consumptions keep at most 65 stored events, and the balance survives eviction), and rollup tests at watermark and reset-window boundaries and at the limit. Both fail when the matching change is reverted.vitest runpasses for@emulators/autumn(61) and@emulators/cloudflare(18); eslint andtscpass for both.