Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 9 additions & 1 deletion 02_activities/assignments/DC_Cohort/Assignment1.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ Steps to complete this part of the assignment:
1. Write a query that `INNER JOIN`s the `vendor` table to the `vendor_booth_assignments` table on the `vendor_id` field they both have in common, and sorts the result by `market_date` then `vendor_name`. Limit to 24 rows of output.

***
### Write SQL

## Section 3:
You can start this section following *session 3*.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ Limit to 25 rows of output.
**HINTS**: you will need to AGGREGATE, GROUP BY, and filter...but remember, STRFTIME returns a STRING for your WHERE statement...
AND be sure you remove the LIMIT from the previous query before aggregating!!


***

## Section 4:
Expand All @@ -209,5 +211,11 @@ Consider, for example, concepts of fariness, inequality, social structures, marg


```
Your thoughts...
Academic research relies on structured databases such as citation indexes, bibliographic databases, and editorial management systems that may initially appear neutral. However, their underlying structures maintain values that can determine which results are shared.

At the structural level, relational tables can define "valuable research" through variables like `Author`, `Paper`, and `Citation` links. This almost equates intellectual value with metrics like the h-index and journal Impact Factors. In doing so, this favors authorship over communal knowledge frameworks that cannot be resolved into a single primary key. For instance, collaborative community insights or multi-generational knowledge lack a 'natural' slot within an individualistic author table. Because the current structure requires individual authors to credit, the communal context of the findings are erased before it reaches the peer review stage.

Furthermore, expected vocabularies and standardized metadata tables tend to maintain an English default. Based on this, non-English and regional studies might be filtered out, unindexed, or difficult to find with current search algorithms, or may potentially result in lower publication impact/reach. This setup seems to signal that local knowledge only matters if it can be translated into the expected terminology. Consequently, scholars outside well-funded institutions must spend additional effort molding their findings to match popular classifications.

This impacts our society directly; such data systems can restrict our understanding and knowledge to whatever neatly fits inside the current relational structures.
```
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion 02_activities/assignments/DC_Cohort/Assignment2.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -192,5 +192,5 @@ Consider, for example, concepts of labour, bias, LLM proliferation, moderating c


```
Your thoughts...
Vicki Boykis’s essay, “Neural nets are just people all the way down,” focuses on the idea that while AI might initially seem like a black-box operating to generate answers, it actually uses databases that were built by millions of people. The main ethical issue discussed is the invisible labor supply chain. Companies tend to present their models as self-learning, but in reality, they rely on massive numbers of low-paid workers to clean data, label images, and assess large volumes of data (some potentially traumatic) to ensure that models are safe to interact with. Beyond these labor dynamics, there is also a serious issue regarding bias, and who decides what data labels are considered normal/neutral. Since these models can take in a massive quantity of data from the internet, they can learn and return racism/sexism/cultural stereotypes and other such harmful biases. Then, there is the assitional issue surrounding consent and creative theft; many artists have reported that their art, code, or writing being scraped from the web without consent or payment, in order to train AI tools such as generative language models. By framing AI as purely automated math rather than learning from extracted human-generated data, the industry may be able to skirt accountability while devaluing the creativity, writing, and labor that made the technology possible in the first place. Moving forward, it would be important for such tech companies to provide disclaimers or recognition for the efforts of the people who collated training data that has been used to strengthen their models.
```
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
114 changes: 67 additions & 47 deletions 02_activities/assignments/DC_Cohort/assignment1.sql
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,31 +6,29 @@
--SELECT
/* 1. Write a query that returns everything in the customer table. */
--QUERY 1




SELECT *
FROM customer;
--END QUERY


/* 2. Write a query that displays all of the columns and 10 rows from the customer table,
sorted by customer_last_name, then customer_first_ name. */
--QUERY 2




SELECT *
FROM customer
ORDER BY customer_last_name, customer_first_name
LIMIT 10;
--END QUERY


--WHERE
/* 1. Write a query that returns all customer purchases of product IDs 4 and 9.
Limit to 25 rows of output. */
--QUERY 3




SELECT *
FROM customer_purchases
WHERE product_id IN (4, 9)
LIMIT 25;
--END QUERY


Expand All @@ -42,10 +40,10 @@ filtered by customer IDs between 8 and 10 (inclusive) using either:
Limit to 25 rows of output.
*/
--QUERY 4




SELECT *, (quantity * cost_per_quantity) AS price
FROM customer_purchases
WHERE customer_id BETWEEN 8 AND 10
LIMIT 25;
--END QUERY


Expand All @@ -55,21 +53,33 @@ Using the product table, write a query that outputs the product_id and product_n
columns and add a column called prod_qty_type_condensed that displays the word “unit”
if the product_qty_type is “unit,” and otherwise displays the word “bulk.” */
--QUERY 5




SELECT
product_id,
product_name,
CASE
WHEN product_qty_type = 'unit' THEN 'unit'
ELSE 'bulk'
END AS prod_qty_type_condensed
FROM product;
--END QUERY


/* 2. We want to flag all of the different types of pepper products that are sold at the market.
add a column to the previous query called pepper_flag that outputs a 1 if the product_name
contains the word “pepper” (regardless of capitalization), and otherwise outputs 0. */
--QUERY 6




SELECT
product_id,
product_name,
CASE
WHEN product_qty_type = 'unit' THEN 'unit'
ELSE 'bulk'
END AS prod_qty_type_condensed,
CASE
WHEN product_name LIKE '%pepper%' THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS pepper_flag
FROM product;
--END QUERY


Expand All @@ -78,10 +88,12 @@ contains the word “pepper” (regardless of capitalization), and otherwise out
vendor_id field they both have in common, and sorts the result by market_date, then vendor_name.
Limit to 24 rows of output. */
--QUERY 7




SELECT *
FROM vendor
INNER JOIN vendor_booth_assignments
ON vendor.vendor_id = vendor_booth_assignments.vendor_id
ORDER BY vendor_booth_assignments.market_date, vendor.vendor_name
LIMIT 24;
--END QUERY


Expand All @@ -92,10 +104,9 @@ Limit to 24 rows of output. */
/* 1. Write a query that determines how many times each vendor has rented a booth
at the farmer’s market by counting the vendor booth assignments per vendor_id. */
--QUERY 8




SELECT vendor_id, COUNT(vendor_id) AS booth_assignments_count
FROM vendor_booth_assignments
GROUP BY vendor_id;
--END QUERY


Expand All @@ -105,10 +116,13 @@ of customers for them to give stickers to, sorted by last name, then first name.

HINT: This query requires you to join two tables, use an aggregate function, and use the HAVING keyword. */
--QUERY 9




SELECT customer.customer_last_name, customer.customer_first_name
FROM customer
JOIN customer_purchases
ON customer.customer_id = customer_purchases.customer_id
GROUP BY customer.customer_id, customer.customer_last_name, customer.customer_first_name
HAVING SUM(customer_purchases.quantity * customer_purchases.cost_per_quantity) > 2000
ORDER BY customer.customer_last_name, customer.customer_first_name;
--END QUERY


Expand All @@ -124,10 +138,11 @@ When inserting the new vendor, you need to appropriately align the columns to be
VALUES(col1,col2,col3,col4,col5)
*/
--QUERY 10
CREATE TEMP TABLE temp.new_vendor AS
SELECT * FROM vendor;




INSERT INTO temp.new_vendor (vendor_id, vendor_name, vendor_type, vendor_owner_first_name, vendor_owner_last_name)
VALUES (10, 'Thomass Superfood Store', 'Fresh Focused', 'Thomas', 'Rosenthal');
--END QUERY


Expand All @@ -138,10 +153,12 @@ HINT: you might need to search for strfrtime modifers sqlite on the web to know
and year are!
Limit to 25 rows of output. */
--QUERY 11




SELECT
customer_id,
strftime('%m', market_date) AS month,
strftime('%Y', market_date) AS year
FROM customer_purchases
LIMIT 25;
--END QUERY


Expand All @@ -152,8 +169,11 @@ HINTS: you will need to AGGREGATE, GROUP BY, and filter...
but remember, STRFTIME returns a STRING for your WHERE statement...
AND be sure you remove the LIMIT from the previous query before aggregating!! */
--QUERY 12




SELECT
customer_id,
SUM(quantity * cost_per_quantity) AS total_spent
FROM customer_purchases
WHERE strftime('%m', market_date) = '04'
AND strftime('%Y', market_date) = '2022'
GROUP BY customer_id;
--END QUERY
Loading
Loading