Skip to content

rolling: EasyNav, NavMap and yaets from lyrical's releases - #110

Open
Tobias-Fischer wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ports/easynav-rolling
Open

Tobias-Fischer wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ports/easynav-rolling

Conversation

@Tobias-Fischer

@Tobias-Fischer Tobias-Fischer commented Oct 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ports RoboStack/ros-rolling#57 by @fmrico (superseding RoboStack/ros-rolling#32): EasyNav isn't released for rolling, so EasyNav 0.5.0, NavMap 0.6.0 and yaets 1.2.0 come in as additional recipes in distros/rolling/rosdistro_additional_recipes.yaml, plus nav2_common/nav2_msgs 1.5.2 that easynav_nav2_bridge needs (Nav2 isn't released for rolling either). Instead of the PR's upstream git revisions they use lyrical's release tags of the same versions, like the existing rolling rtabmap entry. The selection is already shared (Linux, #76).

Built locally

  • rolling, linux-aarch64 (multipass VM): all 59 additional recipes (EasyNav 0.5.0 incl. the playgrounds, NavMap 0.6.0, yaets 1.2.0, nav2_common/nav2_msgs 1.5.2) with their recipe tests, on top of the rolling sync's dependency closure (322 packages).
  • linux-64: not built locally.

Prepared and built on top of the current rosdistro syncs (#62 humble, #61 jazzy, #60 lyrical, #99 rolling) merged together, so it targets their package versions: merge after them. CI is held with [skip ci] until the syncs are in. The rolling sync (#99) also changes this file; rebase after it merges.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Ports RoboStack/ros-rolling#57. They aren't released for rolling, so they
come in as additional recipes from lyrical's release repositories (same
versions: EasyNav 0.5.0, NavMap 0.6.0, yaets 1.2.0), with the
nav2_common/nav2_msgs 1.5.2 that easynav_nav2_bridge needs. The selection
is already shared (Linux).

Co-authored-by: Francisco Martín Rico <3810011+fmrico@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Tobias-Fischer
Tobias-Fischer marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2026 01:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant