code polish

[dengliming]

• Use DataType.valueOf instead of DataType.getDataTypefromString
• Fix model test in windows

java.nio.file.InvalidPathException: Illegal char <:> at index 2: /D:/X/dlm_github/JRedisAI/target/test-classes/test_data/mnist_model_quant.tflite

	at java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsPathParser.normalize(WindowsPathParser.java:182)
	at java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsPathParser.parse(WindowsPathParser.java:153)
	at java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsPathParser.parse(WindowsPathParser.java:77)
	at java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsPath.parse(WindowsPath.java:92)
	at java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsFileSystem.getPath(WindowsFileSystem.java:229)
	at java.base/java.nio.file.Paths.get(Paths.java:84)
	at com.redislabs.redisai.RedisAITest.testSetModelFromModelTFLite(RedisAITest.java:199)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
	at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
	at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:33)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:230)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:58)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.73%. Comparing base (e7cab06) to head (6b6991d).
⚠️ Report is 28 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #27      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.62%   87.73%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         598      587      -11     
  Branches       83       78       -5     
==========================================
- Hits          524      515       -9     
+ Misses         34       33       -1     
+ Partials       40       39       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[DvirDukhan]

hi @dengliming
Thanks for the PRs you submitted!
Any Idea why DeepSource failing on this PR?

[dengliming]

@DvirDukhan yes. but I think these are low priority issues. We can ignore it for now.

[sazzad16]

@gkorland Did you notice that thoretically it's a breaking change?