Skip to content

Release server 0.0.2 - #17

Merged
Eoic merged 14 commits into
masterfrom
development
Oct 10, 2026
Merged

Eoic merged 14 commits into
masterfrom
development

Conversation

@Eoic

@Eoic Eoic commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Release server 0.0.2 before client 0.0.2+2 so the client can persist owned reading goals, activity and goal periods through the API and PowerSync. The additive migration creates three tables and preserves existing book and account data. This release also includes the versioned static web layout, persisted session metadata, serialized session retries and corrected statistics boundaries/streaks.

Validation:

  • Latest fix CI: 377 backend tests pass, 3 skip; Ruff and Mypy pass. The concurrent retry regression fails with the old locking order, and the streak regression bounds work for a year-1-to-present interval.
  • 22 release/deployment tests pass.
  • A production database backup was encrypted off-host, restored into isolated PostgreSQL 17 and upgraded from af0fea8d6317 to b5c6d7e8f901; all 20 existing application tables retained identical row fingerprints.

Deployment: take a fresh consistent database/media/configuration backup, publish and verify the versioned container, migrate once, update the PowerSync publication/configuration and verify API version/health plus PowerSync health before client rollout. Preserve existing credentials, keys and data volumes. Use a merge commit for promotion and synchronize master back into development afterwards.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 10, 2026 22:30

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-10T22:35:13.677281Z ee24638 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ee24638560

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread papyrus/services/progress.py
Comment thread papyrus/services/progress.py
Comment thread papyrus/services/progress.py Outdated
Comment thread papyrus/services/progress.py Outdated
@Eoic
Eoic merged commit e130164 into master Oct 10, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants