[kburger]

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

• pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

	Issue	Score	Upgrade
	Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling SNYK-JAVA-COMFASTERXMLJACKSONCORE-20059179	710	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core: 2.22.1 -> 2.22.3 com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind: 2.22.1 -> 2.22.3 com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml: 2.22.1 -> 2.22.3 Major version upgrade No Path Found Proof of Concept

Breaking Change Risk

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.

Vulnerabilities that could not be fixed

• Upgrade:
  • Could not upgrade org.eclipse.rdf4j:rdf4j-repository-sail@5.3.1 to org.eclipse.rdf4j:rdf4j-repository-sail@6.0.0; Reason could not apply upgrade, dependency is managed externally ; Location: provenance does not contain location
• Could not upgrade org.eclipse.rdf4j:rdf4j-rio-turtle@5.3.1 to org.eclipse.rdf4j:rdf4j-rio-turtle@6.0.0; Reason could not apply upgrade, dependency is managed externally ; Location: provenance does not contain location

---

Important

• Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
• Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
• This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

[kburger]

This upgrade includes a major version update for Eclipse RDF4J from 5.3.1 to 6.0.0, which introduces significant breaking changes. The Jackson library updates are minor patch releases and are considered low risk.

org.eclipse.rdf4j (5.3.1 → 6.0.0)

Risk: HIGH

The upgrade to RDF4J 6.0.0 requires mandatory environment and code changes.

Key Breaking Changes:

• Java 25 Required: The minimum required Java version is now Java 25.
• Jakarta Namespace Migration: RDF4J has migrated from javax.servlet to the jakarta.servlet namespace. Applications that embed RDF4J Server or Workbench or provide custom servlet filters must update their code and use a compatible Jakarta runtime like Jetty 12 or Tomcat 11.
• HTTP Client API Overhaul: The previous integration with Apache HttpComponents 4 has been removed from the public API. It is replaced by a new client-neutral facade. Code that programmatically configured or supplied a custom HttpClient must be migrated to the new rdf4j-http-client-api.
• Major Dependency Updates: Core dependencies have been upgraded, including Spring 7, Lucene 10, and Jackson 3, which could have downstream effects.

Recommendation:
Before merging, developers must ensure the project's runtime environment is updated to Java 25. A thorough review and update of code related to servlet filters and HTTP client configuration is required. Given the scale of these changes, extensive testing is highly recommended.

Source: RDF4J 6.0.0 Release Notes

com.fasterxml.jackson (2.22.1 → 2.22.3)

Risk: LOW

These are patch updates that include bug fixes and security patches (CVE-2026-91776, CVE-2026-91777). No breaking API changes are documented.

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

[kburger]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scan Engine	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues
✅	Licenses	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[qplevier]

bumped elsewhere