fix(data): self-consistency corrections for 261 tablet/watch records - #342
Open
Seungpyo1007 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Seungpyo1007 wants to merge 2 commits into
Seungpyo1007 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Remove the RAM size that was mixed into storage_options_gb for 259 tablet and 2 watch records. In each case the polluting value equals the record's own variant.memory.ram_gb and is strictly smaller than every real storage tier (also present in the same list and confirmed by variant.memory.storage_gb), so it cannot be a storage capacity. Every correction is derived solely from fields already in the same record; no external sources. Refs #296
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
A fresh self-consistency pass over data/tablet/ and data/watch/ (following #301) surfaced 261 records where the device's RAM size had been mixed into storage_options_gb. In each case the polluting value equals the record's own �ariant.memory.ram_gb (and the top-level
am_gb) and is strictly smaller than every real storage tier in the same list — tiers that are independently confirmed by the record's own �ariant.memory.storage_gb. A 1-2 GB entry cannot be a storage capacity for these devices, so it is the RAM size leaking into the storage list.
Every correction is derived solely from fields already present in the same record — no external sources, no invented values. Ambiguous cases (e.g. records carrying two RAM tiers in the list, or where the low value could plausibly be a real storage size) were left untouched.
Example
\iconia-tab-a100:
am_gb\ = 1, \�ariant.memory\ = { ram_gb: 1, storage_gb: 16 }, but \storage_options_gb\ was [1, 16]. The \1\ is the RAM size, not a storage tier → [16].
Tested
Closes #296