Where should an emotional-continuity state layer live in an agent framework? #8741
pioneerjeff
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi, I’m building Emotion Engine, a small local-first emotional-continuity state layer for long-running agents.
The current v0.2.2 release adds a local stdio MCP server plus client registration docs, but I’m still trying to understand the best integration boundary for agent frameworks.
The core idea is: the LLM or host runtime decides what happened; Emotion Engine only persists a compact state packet such as slow mood, short-lived affective pulse, trust movement, and boundary guidance.
From your framework’s perspective, would this fit better as:
or not as part of the framework at all?
Repo: https://github.com/pioneerjeff-labs/emotion-engine
Demo: https://pioneerjeff-labs.github.io/emotion-engine/demo/
MCP docs: https://github.com/pioneerjeff-labs/emotion-engine/blob/main/docs/MCP.md
All reactions